皮皮学,免费搜题
登录
logo - 刷刷题
搜题
【简答题】
Unit 7 passage reading 3- Check your comprehension Passage 3 When Computers Meld with Our Minds Stephen Cass Futurist Vernor Vinge predicts a world of techno-human super beings. Is your overflowing e-mail in-box a herald of the next stage in human evolution? Those e-mails represent just a small sample of the vast amount of digital information being generated by the gigabyte every minute. If we can cope with this rising flood of information, we are likely to be on track for using technology in the creation of superhuman intelligence, according to Vernor Vinge, futurist, best-selling science fiction author, and retired professor of computer science. Machines will become far more than just tools; they will physically merge with us, seamlessly endowing powers that are currently beyond our imagination. And all of this will happen in our lifetime, Vinge says. DISCOVER asked Vinge about the consequences of living in a networked world that generates and distributes more and more data every day and how to cope with information overload. Do we have access to too much information? Almost any amount of information about reality could be useful if it were correlated. When a person gets into the farther reaches of what we in 2008 talk about and imagine when we talk about information overload, 99.99 percent is stuff that should be handled by automated processing. In the olden days that would mean you’d need a staff. For the average person today, that translates into figuring out how to use automated tools. There is one thing that is unsettling to me related to this, and it is that, more and more, the human place is to do certain things: human judgment, human intuition. Those are the things that we still have the edge on, and that’s what we’re really getting paid to do, to intuit, to judge. But those are becoming smaller and smaller points of focus, although absolutely essential to keeping the enterprise moving. It means that from the standpoint of the human, his or her attention is flickering around. I think that constant flickering of attention would manifest to the person as a case of information overload, because we’re used to sitting back and thinking about something and going to have coffee and when we come back from coffee we’re still thinking about the same thing. Part of it is an accommodation problem because this aspect of human nature may have to change. Also part of it is that there are some intuitional and judgmental things where a person does have to think for a long period of time to deliver, and to the extent that this is undermined, that is the real problem. Do you think there is any limit to the amount of information we can use? There’s a science fiction writer called Karl Schroeder who came up with the concept of thalience , the idea that every object should know what it is, where it is, and be able to report that to any nearby object. So in effect reality becomes its own database. At that point you pretty obviously can have any amount of information because reality is a big and fine-grained place. And if you look at all the projects on the Google Labs Web site, there are obviously people who are trying to answer the question of what are all the things we can do with this. This is related to the trend we see with embedded and networked microprocessors. In the 1980s we began to put computers in devices that didn’t seem to need computers, like cameras. Now, of course, we know why we need them in cameras. In the 1990s those devices began to have network access. They’re sort of like an Internet beneath the Internet, digital plankton. Now if this trend persists, then you are looking at one of the possible scenarios that give rise to “the singularity.” What is “the singularity”? What I mean is that I think that in the relatively near future, we will be able to use technology in order to create, or become, creatures of superhuman intelligence. As technological changes go, this is qualitatively different from the big events in the past. You could explain fire or agriculture to somebody who lived before those technologies were invented. But after the singularity — it would be like trying to explain this interview to a goldfish. (From:http://discovermagazine.com/2008/aug/25-when-computers-meld-with-our-minds)
手机使用
分享
复制链接
新浪微博
分享QQ
微信扫一扫
微信内点击右上角“…”即可分享
反馈
参考答案:
举一反三
【简答题】亚洲是我们的“家”,对自己“家”的你熟悉多少?读下图回答问题,看你对我们“家”的位置及一些值得自豪的特点是否清楚。 (1)据题意,把图上的空补充完整。 (2)我们的“家”东临__________洋,北临__________洋,南临__________洋。 (3)我们的“家”在世界七个“大家庭”中最大,你能从哪些方面说明这个“最大”呢?_____________ __________、_______...
【多选题】通常机电设备定期点检周期( )
A.
1500-3000小时
B.
2000-4000小时
C.
3-6月
D.
6-12月
【单选题】某游客在旅游团中处处配合导游,成为团队中的中心人物,得到全体游客的认可,完后了七天广西愉快之旅,他自己也感到很满意、很自豪,说明该游客的自我知觉水平属于( )阶段。
A.
生理的自我
B.
社会的自我
C.
心理的自我
D.
精神的自我
【单选题】实验电路如图所示,电源电压不变,闭合开关S,两灯均发光。一段时间后,一盏灯突然熄灭,而电流表和电压表的示数都不变,出现这一现象的原因可能是( )。
A.
灯L 1 断路
B.
灯L 2 断路
C.
灯L 1 短路
D.
灯L 2 短路
【多选题】通常机电设备定期点检周期( )
A.
1500-3000小时
B.
4000-6000小时
C.
3-6月
D.
6-12月
【多选题】通常机电设备定期点检周期( )
A.
1500-3000
B.
2000-4000
C.
3-6月
D.
6-12月
【单选题】在图所示的电路中,电源电压不变,闭合电键 S , 电路正常工作。一段时间后,发现两个电表示数都发生变化,且灯熄灭。电路中除灯 L 和电阻 R 以外的元件均保持完好,则下列判断中正确的是( )
A.
若电流表示数增大, R 一定短路
B.
若电流表示数增大, L 可能短路
C.
若电压表示数增大, R 一定断路
D.
若电压表示数减小, L 可能断路
【单选题】张翔是某矿业公司露天矿机修车间的一位维修钳工,手艺高,肯负责,人缘好,同事和上级都很喜欢他,车间主任老李更视他为骨干,常让他代自己去矿上或公司开干部会,大家都说李主任的接班人非他莫属。 某个周一,分管人事的周副矿长来电话,说车间李主任重病住院,要张翔暂时代理车间主任,行使权力;还特别关注正在抢修的一台装载机,这台装载机对公司目前的一项工作非常重要。张翔答应周四中午前一定修好交用。 星期三上午,...
A.
优先级D
B.
优先级B
C.
优先级C
D.
优先级A
【单选题】110 实验电路如图所示,电源电压不变,闭合开关S,两灯均发光。一段时间后,一盏灯突然熄灭,而电流表和电压表的示数都不变,出现这一现象的原因可能是( )。
A.
灯L1断路
B.
灯L2断路
C.
灯L1短路
D.
灯L2短路
【简答题】亚洲是我们的“家”,对自己的“家”你熟悉多少?读下图回答问题,看你对我们“家”的位置及一些值得自豪的特点是否清楚。 (1)我们“家”的大部分位于东、西半球的_______半球,位于南、北半球的_______半球。 (2)据题意,把图上的空补充完整。 a b c d e f (3)我们的“家”东临世界最大的大洋_______洋。 (4)值得我们自豪的还有:我们有世界上最高的高原 ____      ...
相关题目:
参考解析:
知识点:
题目纠错 0
发布
创建自己的小题库 - 刷刷题