4 Ryder, a public limited company, is reviewing certain events which have occurred since its year end of 31 October 2005. The financial statements were authorised on 12 December 2005. The following events are relevant to the financial statements for the year ended 31 October 2005: (i) Ryder has a good record of ordinary dividend payments and has adopted a recent strategy of increasing its dividend per share annually. For the last three years the dividend per share has increased by 5% per annum. On 20 November 2005, the board of directors proposed a dividend of 10c per share for the year ended 31 October 2005. The shareholders are expected to approve it at a meeting on 10 January 2006, and a dividend amount of $20 million will be paid on 20 February 2006 having been provided for in the financial statements at 31 October 2005. The directors feel that a provision should be made because a ‘valid expectation’ has been created through the company’s dividend record. (3 marks) (ii) Ryder disposed of a wholly owned subsidiary, Krup, a public limited company, on 10 December 2005 and made a loss of $9 million on the transaction in the group financial statements. As at 31 October 2005, Ryder had no intention of selling the subsidiary which was material to the group. The directors of Ryder have stated that there were no significant events which have occurred since 31 October 2005 which could have resulted in a reduction in the value of Krup. The carrying value of the net assets and purchased goodwill of Krup at 31 October 2005 were $20 million and $12 million respectively. Krup had made a loss of $2 million in the period 1 November 2005 to 10 December 2005. (5 marks) (iii) Ryder acquired a wholly owned subsidiary, Metalic, a public limited company, on 21 January 2004. The consideration payable in respect of the acquisition of Metalic was 2 million ordinary shares of $1 of Ryder plus a further 300,000 ordinary shares if the profit of Metalic exceeded $6 million for the year ended 31 October 2005. The profit for the year of Metalic was $7 million and the ordinary shares were issued on 12 November 2005. The annual profits of Metalic had averaged $7 million over the last few years and, therefore, Ryder had included an estimate of the contingent consideration in the cost of the acquisition at 21 January 2004. The fair value used for the ordinary shares of Ryder at this date including the contingent consideration was $10 per share. The fair value of the ordinary shares on 12 November 2005 was $11 per share. Ryder also made a one for four bonus issue on 13 November 2005 which was applicable to the contingent shares issued. The directors are unsure of the impact of the above on earnings per share and the accounting for the acquisition. (7 marks) (iv) The company acquired a property on 1 November 2004 which it intended to sell. The property was obtained as a result of a default on a loan agreement by a third party and was valued at $20 million on that date for accounting purposes which exactly offset the defaulted loan. The property is in a state of disrepair and Ryder intends to complete the repairs before it sells the property. The repairs were completed on 30 November 2005. The property was sold after costs for $27 million on 9 December 2005. The property was classified as ‘held for sale’ at the year end under IFRS5 ‘Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations’ but shown at the net sale proceeds of $27 million. Property is depreciated at 5% per annum on the straight-line basis and no depreciation has been charged in the year. (5 marks) (v) The company granted share appreciation rights (SARs) to its employees on 1 November 2003 based on ten million shares. The SARs provide employees at the date the rights are exercised with the right to receive cash equal to the appreciation in the company’s share price since the grant date. The rights vested on 31 October 2005 and payment was made on schedule on 1 December 2005. The fair value of the SARs per share at 31 October 2004 was $6, at 31 October 2005 was $8 and at 1 December 2005 was $9. The company has recognised a liability for the SARs as at 31 October 2004 based upon IFRS2 ‘Share-based Payment’ but the liability was stated at the same amount at 31 October 2005. (5 marks) Required: Discuss the accounting treatment of the above events in the financial statements of the Ryder Group for the year ended 31 October 2005, taking into account the implications of events occurring after the balance sheet date. (The mark allocations are set out after each paragraph above.) (25 marks)