It is never easy to identify the complexity of the negotiating subject and the priority when it comes to the agenda-making phase in international business negotiation. Some simple issues could be easily resolved when negotiators put most of their time and energy into complicated subjects first. Generally speaking, the efficiency of a negotiation can be improved. However, it is better to resolve an easier problem before a complicated one to avoid the deadlocking at the very beginning of the negotiation when the confidence has not been built or there is no sufficient communication between both parties. For example, in 1991, when the United States tried to persuade Israel to return to the negotiating table to make peace talks with the PLO James Beak, the U.S. Secretary of State was resisted by Israel. They firmly believed that Israelis could be requested to withdraw their troops from Palestine settlements as soon as the negotiation started, which was impossible for Israelis, so that they simply refused to sit down at the negotiating table with the PLO. Suppose you were James Beak, what would be the best order for the negotiating ? ( ).