皮皮学,免费搜题
登录
logo - 刷刷题
搜题
【单选题】
A federal judge on Monday certified a $200 billion class action lawsuit against the tobacco industry for its marketing of light cigarettes. Eastern District of New York Judge Jack B. Weinstein's 540-page opinion in Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 04-CIV-1945—which included an additional 965 pages of appendices for a total of 1,505 pages—gave tens of millions of smokers an avenue to recover damages from the nation's largest tobacco companies, including Philip Morris USA Inc., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Lorillard Tobacco Co., and Liggett Group, Inc. The class will include anyone who purchased light cigarettes from the time tobacco companies began selling them in the 1970s. The judge said he even would consider broadening the class, to encompass smokers of all 'low tar' brands, not just light cigarettes. The judge suggested that an expansion of the class could assist the parties in negotiating a global settlement. He set a trial date for January 22, 2007. The plaintiffs intend to seek treble damages. einstein has expressed skepticism about the plaintiffs' theory of damages, which alleges that light smokers were defrauded of billions because they believed they were buying a product of greater value because of its health advantages. The judge also questioned the size of the class, as well as the claim that as many as 90 percent of light cigarette smokers chose the cigarettes because they were less harmful. In his ruling Monday, the judge stressed that while the suit was far from perfect, the evidence was sufficient. He said the jury system—which he described as the 'ultimate focus group of the law'—was well equipped to sort out the particulars in accordance with Amendment Ⅶ of the U.S. Constitution. Weinstein declined to grant an interlocutory appeal to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Theodore M. Grossman of Jones Day in Cleveland, which represents R.J. Reynolds, said the defendants would seek a stay and appeal the class certification under Rule 23(f)of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. From the passage it can be inferred that 'a $200 billion class action lawsuit' is one that ______ .
A.
requires a public fund of $200 billion
B.
may lead to US $200 billion in payment
C.
involves an investment of US $200 billion
D.
is about what the tobacco industry is worth
手机使用
分享
复制链接
新浪微博
分享QQ
微信扫一扫
微信内点击右上角“…”即可分享
反馈
参考答案:
举一反三
【单选题】保函项下担保权益的享受着,也就是有权按保函规定通过提交某种单据或声明向担保行索取款项的人, 是保函的()
A.
申请人
B.
担保行
C.
受益人
D.
反担保行
【简答题】压铸生产时,压铸涂料应具有哪些作用?
【单选题】病理反射的出现是由于
A.
脊髓反射弧的损害
B.
神经系统兴奋性增高
C.
脑干网状结构损害
D.
椎体束受损
E.
基底节受损
【单选题】病理反射的出现是由于:
A.
脊髓反射弧的损害
B.
基底节受损
C.
锥体束损害
D.
脑干网状结构损害。
【单选题】病理反射的出现是由于:
A.
脊髓反射弧的损害
B.
神经系统兴奋性增高
C.
基底节受损
D.
锥体束损害
【单选题】病理反射的出现是由于
A.
锥体束损伤
B.
神经系统兴奋性增高
C.
基底节受损
D.
脊髓反射弧的损害
E.
脑干网状结构损害
【简答题】请列举客户忠诚的策略。
【单选题】病理反射的出现是由于
A.
脊髓反射弧的损害
B.
神经系统兴奋性增高
C.
基底节受损
D.
锥体束损害
E.
脑干网状结构损害
【单选题】病理反射的出现是由于
A.
锥体束损害
B.
神经系统兴奋性增高
C.
基底节受损
D.
脊髓反射弧的损害
E.
脑干网状结构损害
【单选题】下列不符合支气管扩张症特点的是()
A.
多发生于叶及段等大支气管
B.
主要发病基础是支气管壁的炎症损坏
C.
临床表现咳大量脓痰及反复咯血
D.
可导致肺心病
E.
肺脓肿为常见并发症
相关题目:
参考解析:
知识点:
题目纠错 0
发布
创建自己的小题库 - 刷刷题