皮皮学,免费搜题
登录
logo - 刷刷题
搜题
【简答题】
任务型阅读 (共10小题;每小题1分,满分10分) 请认真阅读下列短文,并根据所读内容在文章后表格中的空格里填入一个最恰当的单词。 注意:每个空格只填1个单词。请将答案写在答题卡上相应题号的横线上。 Waste to Energy—JUST BURN IT! WHY BURN WASTE? Waste-to-energy plants generate (产生) enough electricity to supply 2.4 million households in the US. But, providing electricity is not the major advantage of waste-to-energy plants. In fact, it costs more to generate electricity at a waste-to-energy plant than it does at a coal, nuclear, or hydropower plant. The major advantage of burning waste is that it considerably reduces the amount of trash going to landfills. The average American produces more than 1,600 pounds of waste a year. If all this waste were landfilled, it would take more than two cubic yards of landfill space. That’s the volume of a box three feet long, three feet wide, and six feet high. If that waste were burned, the ashes would fit into a box three feet long, three feet wide, but only nine inches high! Some communities in the Northeast may be running out of land for new landfills. And, since most people don’t want landfills in their backyards, it has become more difficult to obtain permits to build new landfills. Taking the country as a whole, the United States has plenty of open space, of course, but it is expensive to transport garbage a long distance to put it into a landfill. TO BURN OR NOT TO BURN? Some people are concerned that burning garbage may harm the environment. Like coal plants, waste-to-energy plants produce air pollution when the fuel is burned to produce steam or electricity. Burning garbage releases the chemicals and substances found in the waste. Some chemicals can be a threat to people, the environment, or both, if they are not properly controlled. Some critics of waste-to-energy plants are afraid that burning waste will hamper (妨碍,阻碍) recycling programs. If everyone sends their trash to a waste-to-energy plant, they say, there will be little motive to recycle. Several states have considered or are considering banning waste-to-energy plants unless recycling programs are in place. Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York City have delayed new waste-to-energy plants, hoping to increase the level of recycling first. So, what’s the real story? Can recycling and burning waste coexist? At first glance, recycling and waste-to-energy seem to be at odds (不一致), but they can actually complement (弥补) each other. That’s because it makes good sense to recycle some materials, and better sense to burn others. Let’s look at aluminum, for example. Aluminum mineral is so expensive to mine that recycling aluminum more than pays for itself. Burning it produces no energy. So clearly, aluminum is valuable to recycle and not useful to burn. Paper, on the other hand, can either be burned or recycled—it all depends on the price the used paper will bring. Plastics are another matter. Because plastics are made from petroleum and natural gas, they are excellent sources of energy for waste-to-energy plants. This is especially true since plastics are not as easy to recycle as steel, aluminum, or paper. Plastics almost always have to be hand sorted and making a product from recycled plastics may cost more than making it from new materials. To burn or not to burn is not really the question. We should use both recycling and waste-to-energy as alternatives to landfilling. Waste to Energy—JUST BURN IT! WHY BURN WASTE? Advantages of waste to Energy ◆Though at a high (71) _______, waste-to-energy plants can produce enough electricity for 2.4 million US households. ◆Burning waste can (72) _______ a considerable amount of trash going to landfills. (73)_______ for landfilling ◆Some communities (74) _______ land for new landfills. ◆Most people refuse to build landfills around. ◆Building landfills in far-away areas will increase the cost of (75) _______ garbage. TO BURN OR NOT TO BURN? (76) __________ about burning garbage ◆Burning garbage releases chemicals, which, if not properly controlled, can be (77) _______ to people and the environment. ◆Burning garbage will hamper recycling programs. Coexistence of recycling and burning waste Recycling and waste-to-energy can go well with each other in that some materials like aluminum are fit to recycle, while others like plastics are fit to (78) _______. (79)__________ Whether to burn or not to burn, we should (80) _______ landfilling with both recycling and waste-to-energy to deal with garbage.
手机使用
分享
复制链接
新浪微博
分享QQ
微信扫一扫
微信内点击右上角“…”即可分享
反馈
参考答案:
举一反三
【判断题】1929年,美国发明家爱德文林克率先设计了第一台真正意义上的商业飞行模拟器。
A.
正确
B.
错误
【单选题】单击“修改|楼板”选项卡→形状编辑面板→( )命令,可在楼板面上任意位置添加新的边线。
A.
修建|延申单个图元
B.
阵列
C.
添加分割线
【单选题】单击“修改|楼板”选项卡→形状编辑面板→( )命令,可在楼版面上任意位置提添加新的边线。
A.
修建|延申单个图元
B.
阵列
C.
添加分割线
【单选题】表单“属性”面板的“方法”下拉列表框用于选择传送表单数据的方式,其中GET选项表示( )。
A.
将表单中的信息以追加到处理程序地址后面的方式进行传送
B.
传送表单数据时它将表单信息嵌入到请求处理程序中
C.
采用浏览器默认的设置对表单数据进行传送
D.
将表单中的信息直接发送到处理程序进行传送
【多选题】下面说法正确的是( )?
A.
希腊数学家欧几里德Euclid发现了人类之所以能洞察立体空间,主要是由左右眼所看到的图像不同而产生的,这种现象被叫做双眼视差。
B.
1929年,美国发明家爱德文林克率先设计了第一台真正意义上的商业飞行模拟器。
C.
斯坦利•G•温鲍姆(Stanley G. Weinbaum)的科幻小说《皮格马利翁的眼镜》,这是被认为探讨虚拟现实的第一部科幻作品。
D.
1957年,美国发明家莫顿海利西成功造出了一台能够正常运转的3D视频机器。
【单选题】通常所说的“金边债券”是指( )。
A.
企业债券
B.
金融债券
C.
黄金储备为担保而发行的债券
D.
政府债券
【单选题】下面不属于网络营销基础职能的是( )。
A.
网上调研
B.
网络品牌
C.
客户关系
D.
客户服务
【单选题】通常所说的“金边债券”是指( ) 企业债券 金融债券 以黄金储备为担保而发行的债券 政府债券
A.
它是一种针对富裕阶层的小众化信托投资工具
B.
一般认为,基金起源于美国
C.
基金产业发展滞后,尚不能与银行业、证券业、保险业并驾齐驱
D.
开放式基金后来居上,逐渐成为基金设立的主流形式
【判断题】安贫乐道的“贫”就是一穷二白。
A.
正确
B.
错误
【单选题】“金边债券”通常指的是( )。
A.
政府债券
B.
企业债券
C.
金融债券
D.
实物债券
相关题目:
参考解析:
知识点:
题目纠错 0
发布
创建自己的小题库 - 刷刷题