State A and State B are member states of the European Union. Invento Co. owns the patent for the manufacture of widgets in both State A and State B. It licensed the right to use the patent in State A to Alpha Co. and the right to use the patent in State B to Bravo Co. The licenses forbid Alpha Co. from exporting its widgets to State B and Bravo Co. from exporting its widgets to State A. Parallel Co. purchases widgets from Alpha in State A and exports them to State B where it sells them in direct competition with Bravo. Invento, Alpha, and Bravo have now all brought suit to enjoin Parallel from doing this. The court hearing this suit will: A. award the injunction, since the sale of widgets manufactured by someone other than a licensee of Invento infringes Invento Co.’s right to license the production of widgets in member states of the Union. B. award the injunction, since the sale of widgets manufactured by someone other than Bravo Co. infringes Bravo Co.’s right to manufacture widgets in State B. C. refuse to award the injunction, because the free movement of goods throughout the Union cannot be impaired for any reason. D. refuse to award the injunction, because the rights held by a common patent holder (i.e., Invento) and its licensees (i.e., Alpha and Bravo) are exhausted once the goods are put into circulation anywhere in the Union.