皮皮学,免费搜题
登录
logo - 刷刷题
搜题
【单选题】
The idea that government should regulate intellectual property through copyrights and patents is relatively recent in human history, and the precise details of what intellectual property is protected for how long vary across nations and occasionally change. There are two standard sociological justifications for patents or copyrights: they reward creators for their labor, and they encourage greater creativity. Both of these are empirical claims that can be tested scientifically and could be false in some realms. Consider music. Star performers existed before the 20th century, such as Franz Liszt and Niccolo Paganini, but mass media produced a celebrity system promoting a few stars whose music was not necessarily the best or most diverse. Copyright provides protection for distribution companies and for a few celebrities, thereby helping to support the industry as currently defined, but it may actually harm the majority of performers. This is comparable to Anatole France's famous irony, 'The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges. ' In theory, copyright covers the creations of celebrities and obscurities equally, but only major distribution companies have the resources to defend their property rights in court. In a sense, this is quite fair, because nobody wants to steal unpopular music, but by supporting the property rights of celebrities, copyright strengthens them as a class in contrast to anonymous musicians. Internet music file sharing has become a significant factor in the social lives of children, who download bootleg music tracks for their own use and to give as gifts to friends. If we are to believe one recent poll done It will not be easy to test such hypotheses, and extensive economic research has not conclusively answered the question of whether the patent system really promotes innovation. We will need many careful, sharp-focus studies of well-formed hypotheses in specific industries and sectors of life. For example, observational and interview research can uncover the factors that really promote cultural innovation among artists of various kinds and determine the actual consequences for children of Internet peer-to-peer file sharing. Which of the following statements about intellectual property is NOT true?
A.
Countries may differ in their efforts to protect it.
B.
The author considers its protection well-grounded.
C.
People believe its protection may benefit creators.
D.
The history of its protection has not been long.
手机使用
分享
复制链接
新浪微博
分享QQ
微信扫一扫
微信内点击右上角“…”即可分享
反馈
参考答案:
举一反三
【单选题】患儿,3岁,因先天性心脏病入院,3天后并发心力衰竭,转入重症监护病房。患儿家长非常担心患儿情况,病房护士正确的处理是
A.
工作太忙可问其他护士
B.
问值班医生比较好
C.
告知其完全正常
D.
客观介绍患者情况
E.
要注意隐私权,需保密患儿病情
【单选题】临床思维的过程可分为( )
A.
医疗思维和护理思维
B.
诊断思维和治疗思维
C.
诊断思维和护理思维
D.
治疗思维和提高预后思维
【判断题】根据思维的指向性分为集中性思维和发散性思维,根据思维的创造性又可分为习惯性思维和创造性思维等。()
A.
正确
B.
错误
【单选题】患儿,3岁,因先天性心脏病入院,3天后并发心衰,转入重症监护病房。 常担心患儿情况,病房护士正确的处理是
A.
工作太忙让患儿家属问其他护士
B.
问值班医生比较好
C.
告知其完全正常
D.
客观介绍病人情况
E.
要注意隐私权,需保密患儿情况
【简答题】某工程项目,建设单位与施工总承包单位按《建设工程合同(示范文本)》签订了施工承包合同,并委托某监理公司承担施工阶段的监理任务。施工总承包单位将桩基工程分包给一家专业施工单位。 开工前:①总监理工程师组织监理人员熟悉设计文件时发现部分图纸设计不当,即通过计算修改了该部分图纸,并直接签发给施工总承包单位;②在工程定位放线期间,总监理工程师又指派测量监理员复核施工总承包单位报送的原始基准点、基准线和测量...
【单选题】以结果为导向的职业思维包括:()
A.
系统思维和创新思维
B.
系统思维和形象思维
C.
创新思维和逻辑思维
D.
形象思维和逻辑思维
【单选题】患儿,3岁,因先天性心脏病入院,3天后并发心力衰竭,转入重症监护病房。患儿家长非常担心患儿情况,病房护士正确的处理是
A.
工作太忙可问其他护士
B.
问值班医生比较好
C.
眚知其完全正常
D.
客观介绍患者情况
E.
要注意隐私权,需保密患儿病情
【判断题】抽象思维分为形式思维和辩证思维。()
A.
正确
B.
错误
【单选题】患儿,3岁,因先天性心脏病入院,3天后并发心衰,转入重症监护病房。患 儿家属担心患儿情况,病房护士正确的处理是
A.
工作太忙让患儿家属问其他护士
B.
问值班医生比较好
C.
告知其完全正常
D.
客观介绍病人情况
E.
要注意隐私权,需保密患儿情况
【判断题】思维可以分为潜意识思维和有意识思维两类。()
A.
正确
B.
错误
相关题目:
参考解析:
知识点:
题目纠错 0
发布
创建自己的小题库 - 刷刷题