皮皮学,免费搜题
登录
logo - 刷刷题
搜题
【单选题】
请阅读Passage 2,完成第26—30题。 Passage 2 Until a decade or two ago, the centers of many Western cities were emptying while their edges were spreading. This was not for the reasons normally cited. Neither the car nor the motorway caused suburban sprawl, although they sped it up: cities were spreading before either came along. Nor was the flight to the suburbs caused by racism. Whites fled inner-city neighborhoods that were becoming black, but they also fled ones that were not. Planning and zoning rules encouraged sprawl, as did tax breaks for home ownership——but cities spread regardless of these. The real cause was mass affluence. As people grew richer, they demanded more privacy and space. Only a few could afford that in city centers; the rest moved out. The same process is now occurring in the developing world, but much more quickly. The pop-ulation density of metropolitan Beijing has collapsed since 1970, falling from 425 people per hectare to 65. Indian cities are following; Brazil's are ahead. And suburbanization has a long way to run. Beijing is now about as crowded as metropolitan Chicago was at its most closely packed, in the 1920s. Since then Chicago's density has fallen by almost three-quarters. This is welcome. Romantic notions of sociable, high-density living——notions pushed, for the most part, by people who themselves occupy rather spacious residences——ignore the squalor and lack of privacy to be found in Kinshasa, Mumbai or the other crowded cities of the poor world. Many of them are far too dense for dignified living, and need to spread out. The Western suburbs to which so many aspire are healthier than their detractors say. The modern Stepfords are no longer white monocultures, but that is progress. For every Ferguson there are many American suburbs that have quietly become black, Hispanic or Asian, or a blend of every-one. Picaresque accounts of decay overlook the fact that America's suburbs are half as criminal and a little more than half as poor as central cities. Even as urban centers revive, more Americans move from city centre to suburb than go the other way. But the West has also made mistakes, from which the rest of the world can learn. The first lesson is that suburban sprawl imposes costs on everyone. Suburbanites tend to use more roads and consume more carbon than urbanites (though perhaps not as much as distant commuters forced out by green belts). But this damage can be alleviated by a carbon tax, by toll roads and by charging for parking. Many cities in the emerging world have followed the foolish American practice of re-quiring property developers to provide a certain number of parking spaces for every building——something that makes commuting by car much more attractive than it would be otherwise. Scrap-ping them would give public transport a chance. The second is that it is foolish to try to stop the spread of suburbs. Green belts, the most ef-fective method for doing this, push up property prices and encourage long-distance commuting. The cost of housing in London, already astronomical, went up by 19% in the past year, reflecting not just the city's strong economy but also the impossibility of building on its edges. The insistence on big minimum lot sizes in some American suburbs and rural areas has much the same effect. Cities that try to prevent growth through green belts often end up weakening themselves, as Seoul has done. A wiser policy would be to plan for huge expansion. Acquire strips of land for roads and rail-ways, and chunks for parks, before the city sprawls into them. New York's 19th-century governors decided where Central Park was going to go long before the city reached it. New York went on to develop in a way that they could not have imagined, but the park is still there. This is not the state control of the new-town planner——that confident soul who believes he knows where people will want to live and work, and how they will get from one to the other. It is the realism needed to manage the inevitable. A model of living that has broadly worked well in the West is spreading, adapting to local conditions as it goes. We should all look forward to the time when Chinese and Indian teenagers write sulky songs about the appalling dullness of suburbia. For which of the following reasons did the west move out of cities? 查看材料
A.
They didn't need to pay higher taxes when living in suburbs.
B.
Car industry rapidly developed and motorways swiftly emerged.
C.
They discriminated against the black people living in city centers.
D.
The richer they grew, the more demand they had on privacy and space.
手机使用
分享
复制链接
新浪微博
分享QQ
微信扫一扫
微信内点击右上角“…”即可分享
反馈
参考答案:
举一反三
【单选题】以下按劣药处理的是
A.
超过有效期
B.
所含成分不符合药品标准的
C.
所含成分的含量不符合药品标准的
D.
非药品冒充药品
【单选题】人类历史上唯一以公有制为基础建立的法律制度是( )。
A.
奴隶制法律
B.
封建制法律
C.
资本主义法律
D.
社会主义法律
【单选题】以下按劣药处理的是()
A.
超过有效期的
B.
变质的
C.
被污染的
D.
必须检验而未经检验即销售的
E.
必须批准而未经批准进口的
【单选题】HRB335钢筋指的是
A.
一级钢
B.
二级钢
C.
三级钢
D.
四级钢
【单选题】三级钢筋是指( )。
A.
HPB300
B.
HRB335
C.
HRB400
D.
HRB500
【单选题】浅感觉检查时发现病人触觉正常,两点辨别觉障碍时,则考虑为
A.
脊髓丘脑侧束损害
B.
后索病损
C.
额叶病变
D.
皮质病变
E.
丘脑水平以上病变
【单选题】从宏观角度讲,项目发起人可以( )
A.
减少项目的建设风险和经营风险
B.
促成工程项目融资的完成
C.
可以为项目建设提供一种良好的投资环境
D.
可以为项目提供条件优惠的出口信贷和其他类型的贷款或贷款担保
【单选题】以下按劣药处理的情况是
A.
被污染的不能药用的的药品
B.
超过有效期的药品
C.
试生产期的药品
D.
药品成分的含量不符合国家标准规定的药品
【单选题】以下按劣药处理的是( )。
A.
.超过有效期的
B.
变质的
C.
被污染的
D.
必须检验而未经检验即销售的
【单选题】以下属于按劣药处理的是( )
A.
超过有效期的
B.
变质的
C.
被污染的
D.
必须检验而未经检验即销售的
E.
药品含量与国家药品标准不符的
相关题目:
参考解析:
知识点:
题目纠错 0
发布
创建自己的小题库 - 刷刷题