皮皮学,免费搜题
登录
logo - 刷刷题
搜题
【简答题】
Non-tariff Barriers
手机使用
分享
复制链接
新浪微博
分享QQ
微信扫一扫
微信内点击右上角“…”即可分享
反馈
参考答案:
举一反三
【简答题】科教兴国战略主要是指( )。
【单选题】听力原文: Buried treasure is scattered over every part of the United States. Why don't people find it? As a matter of fact, a great deal of buried treasure is found much more than we ever hear about, peop...
A.
Treasure hunters don't report their finds to avoid paying taxes on it.
B.
Those who find treasure usually keep it to themselves for fear that others might claim it.
C.
The police don' t bother about keeping a record.
D.
Both A and B
【多选题】在金属线胀系数实验中,金属管的长度变化量与下面那些因素有关()
A.
温度变化量
B.
金属管的直径
C.
金属管的长度
D.
金属管的内径
【简答题】下列关于故意泄露军事秘密罪与间谍罪之间的关系,说法正确的是(    )。 A.前者侵犯的犯罪客体是国家保守军事秘密的管理制度,后者侵犯的犯罪客体是我国的国家安全 B.前者表现为违反规定,泄露军事秘密,后者表现为参加间谍组织、接受间谍组织任务和为敌人指示轰击目标 C.前者只能由军职人员实施,后者除军职人员外还可以由非军职人员实施 D.前者没有的目的,后者有的目的
【单选题】间谍罪侵犯的客体是()。
A.
国家的主权
B.
国家的统一
C.
国家的安全
D.
国家的利益
【判断题】间谍罪所侵害的客体,是中华人民共和国的国家的统一。( )
A.
正确
B.
错误
【简答题】例 3 :按年利率 12% ,每季度计息一次计算利息,从现在起连续 3 年的等额年末借款为 1000 元,问与其等值的第 3 年年末的几借款金额为多大?
【简答题】A企业正在着手编制2017年1月份的现金预算。有关资料如下: (1)2016年末现金余额为8000元; (2)2016年末有息负债余额为12000元,已知年利率4%,按季支付利息; (3)2016年末应收账款4000元,预计月内可收回80%; (4)预计销售产品10000件,每件5元,增值税率17%,预计月内销售的收款比例为50%; (5)需要采购材料的成本为8000元,增值税率17%,70%当月...
【简答题】13-1、某企业正在着手编制明年1月份的现金收支计划。有关资料如下: ( 1)月初现金余额为8000元; ( 2)月初有息负债余额为12000元,年利率4%,按月支付利息; ( 3)月初应收账款4000元,预计月内可收回80%; ( 4)预计销售收入58500元,预计月内销售的收款比例为50%; ( 5)需要采购材料的成本为9360元,70%当月付现; ( 6)月初应付账款余额5000元需在月内全...
【单选题】Managers are frequently too busy to deal with the development of high-flyers.
A.
Existing management research does not tell us much about how to find and develop high-flyers, those people who have the potential to reach the top of an organisation. As a result, organisations are left to formulate their own systems. A more effective overall policy for developing future leaders is needed, which is why the London Business School has launched the Tomorrow's Leaders Research Group (TLRG). The group contains representatives from 20 firms, and meets regularly to discuss the leadership development of the organisations' high-flyers.
B.
TLRG recognises just how significant line managers are in the process of leadership development. Unfortunately, with today's flat organisations, where managers have functional as well as managerial responsibilities, people development all too often falls victim to heavy workloads. One manager in the research group was unconvinced by the logic of sending his best people away on development courses, 'only to see them poached by another department or, worse still, another firm'. This fear of losing high-flyers runs deep in the organisations that make up the research group.
C.
TLRG argues that the task of management is not necessarily about employee retention, but about creating 'attraction centres'. 'We must help line managers to realise that if their companies are known as ones that develop their people, they will have a greater appeal to high-flyers,' said one advisor. Furthermore, selecting people for, say, a leadership development programme is a sign of commitment from management to an individual. Loyalty can then be more easily demanded in return.
D.
TLRG has concluded that a company's HR specialists need to take action and engage with line managers individually about their role in the development of high-flyers. Indeed, in order to benefit fully from training high-flyers as the senior managers of the future, firms must actually address the development of all managers who will be supporting the high-flyers. Without this, managers will not be in a position to give appropriate advice. And when eventually the high-flyers do move on, new ones will be needed to replace them. The next challenge will be to find a new generation of high-flyers.
相关题目:
【单选题】Managers are frequently too busy to deal with the development of high-flyers.
A.
Existing management research does not tell us much about how to find and develop high-flyers, those people who have the potential to reach the top of an organisation. As a result, organisations are left to formulate their own systems. A more effective overall policy for developing future leaders is needed, which is why the London Business School has launched the Tomorrow's Leaders Research Group (TLRG). The group contains representatives from 20 firms, and meets regularly to discuss the leadership development of the organisations' high-flyers.
B.
TLRG recognises just how significant line managers are in the process of leadership development. Unfortunately, with today's flat organisations, where managers have functional as well as managerial responsibilities, people development all too often falls victim to heavy workloads. One manager in the research group was unconvinced by the logic of sending his best people away on development courses, 'only to see them poached by another department or, worse still, another firm'. This fear of losing high-flyers runs deep in the organisations that make up the research group.
C.
TLRG argues that the task of management is not necessarily about employee retention, but about creating 'attraction centres'. 'We must help line managers to realise that if their companies are known as ones that develop their people, they will have a greater appeal to high-flyers,' said one advisor. Furthermore, selecting people for, say, a leadership development programme is a sign of commitment from management to an individual. Loyalty can then be more easily demanded in return.
D.
TLRG has concluded that a company's HR specialists need to take action and engage with line managers individually about their role in the development of high-flyers. Indeed, in order to benefit fully from training high-flyers as the senior managers of the future, firms must actually address the development of all managers who will be supporting the high-flyers. Without this, managers will not be in a position to give appropriate advice. And when eventually the high-flyers do move on, new ones will be needed to replace them. The next challenge will be to find a new generation of high-flyers.
参考解析:
知识点:
题目纠错 0
发布
创建自己的小题库 - 刷刷题